In CCX you can use the card NODE PRINT and ask for the RF (reaction forces) on the node (must be a node set). CCX will write reaction forces and reaction moments in a separated text file (extension .dat). Read the CCX documentation about that card.
Probably you are applying two different restrains to the same node. Sometimes happens on the simmetry planes. Upload the model and maybe we could understand it quicker and give a better answer.
The part must be well positioned in the CAD before exporting to Mecway. You could move it in Mecway, but the CAD will be quicker, easy and more accurate than moving/reorienting the mesh.
You can hide/unhide components of the assembly in CGX directly, you must open the .frd and .inp files from the command line. Check the CGX documentation or look in the CCX Yahoo list, I remember that this question was answered there.
If I had undertood well, you need to model the plate first without interescting the cuboid, and then by means of a static step move it (including contacts) in X direction to the final position to see the stress on the assembly. After the plate is on…
Hi, I have tested other comercials solvers on the same machine (Intel i7-3632QM @2.2Ghz / 8GB RAM), with the same model/bc, and found that while was unnable to solve with CalculiX, even with half of the resources (cores and memory) the other ones so…
Just make a try blocking DOF 1,2 and 3 on the nodes at the base of the cube (and removing rigid body card). As I understand, now with the rígid body you will have a rotation when the ball impact the cube as there are no rotational restrain (or even …
In case of using RIGID BODY you should add a second reference node to be able to block also the rotations DOFs.
Check this thread
mecway.com/forum/discussion/comment/1247/#Comment_1247
I'm using a Windows utility (Vtk Post, https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/CALCULIX/files/VtkLazarus1.4.zip) but is not perfect.
I have tryed others but all lack of basic features (not all elements are converted, some fields variables are missed...…
Is a normal behaviour. What you can do is first select all the nodes as you say, and then change the selector to elements. Or select the elements directly by the components name on the tree.
Roland, in my experience with Solidworks or Solidedge, if I model the components in the origin of coordinates, and then create an assembly with the right position, then if I export the parts from the assembly, they will be exported "in assembly posi…
Yes, I supposse that. I will add the PEEK material as per the above spec and then fix one side and apply the load on the other by means of a rigid body simulating a plain bearing (or the plain bearing should be in the two ends???). Just to be sure t…
Tom, what you can do in Mecway is after meshing, scale the mesh (so, if you have created bc, loads, named selections... it will be keeped). Can you attach directly the .liml file? I will have a little of time to see it during the night.
twilliams55, you can export directly as step in Solidworks, and then Mecway should be able to import it with the right size. Anyway if you don't want to recreate the model, you can scale the mesh to the right size in Mecway directly.
For the boundary condition you could create a reference node at the center of the face, then link all the nodes of the faces to this reference node by means of the RIGID BODY card (not present in Mecway solver or GUI, so you should change the solver…
For metal springs, normally stresses are very low. Have you turn on geometric no lineal? And what about the stiffness that you have, does match with the predicted value?
Regards
For this kind of geometries If they are perfectly modeled in the cad, then it should be able to merge it on the same cad program. As you say, sometimes you need to force the intersection to make the fusion to work. If you cannot do it in the cad, su…