Yes, beam elements work with thermal stress.
Your screenshot shows analysis type is thermal, so change it to static which has displacement DOFs. That's also why many of the boundary conditions are shown in red, which means error (displacement const…
From your pictures, it looks like Spooles doesn't converge in either version so there's no inconsistency there, and Pastix is the one that gives different results. Is that right?
Pastix can give random results with mixed precision, which is the def…
File not attached.
That is a worry if they both converge with different solutions. I'm looking forward to seeing your example.
You can use PARDISO by building from the source included with Mecway, or possibly download a compiled binary from dhondt…
@Fatmac C3D8I performs much better than C3D8, which is practically useless for anything with bending. C3D8R has some problems according to the manual - under-stiff in bending and constant strain due to 1 integration point. C3D20 is pretty good alrea…
Hello windys53. The forum can be flakey sometimes and might need a reload or cache clearing.
To get radial displacement in the solution, use Solution -> Formula and enter a formula like
( x*u.x + y*u.y ) / sqrt(x^2+y^2)
I've seen this before. It seems to be common for elastic contact on curved surfaces with incompatible meshes, even when there's no interference. I wonder if it might be a bug in CCX.
Hello Youk
1. It can't import OpenFoam pressure, and having a different pressure on each element/node is difficult in Mecway because each one appears as a separate pressure item in the outline tree. You could write a script to generate the .liml fi…
There's something strange about your picture showing time = 1000000000 s. I didn't wait for a solution that way though and got a more reasonable looking one by doing this:
* Add No extra contact step to the CCX branch in the outline tree.
* Ch…
I see. It looks like the AI is trying to editing the mesh instead of applying a displacement constraint.
You can do a radial prescribed displacement without a script, using formulas in Displacement like this:
If you need to adjust the distance in…
You can do that with Mesh tools -> Move/copy, Set Coordinate system to Cylindrical (Z axis).
But if you do need a script, could you please format the script to "Code" in the forum otherwise indenting is lost and other things get changed.
Is it …
Shell offset doesn't currently work with OpenRadioss. I'm not sure if OpenRadioss even has that capability? I see that Mecway allows you to define shell offset and doesn't give any error message. This is wrong and I'll make it clear that it won't wo…
I'm not sure. It looks like it has read equivalent plastic strain from the CCX output because it's showing zero instead of nothing. Perhaps have a look at the .frd file to see if there should be non-zero values on those nodes.
40/(0.9*1.565) is half the length of the bridge (unit is meter) so that it starts from the -x end instead of the origin.
unittriangle(w,x) is this with area = 1. You add a constant to x to shift it in space, and add a multiple of t to make it shift…
I'll change the traction unit from MPa to Pa because there's a unit conversion factor in there that makes it more confusing to me:
-(180/4.3) * unittriangle(0.5, (0.9*1.565)*t-40/(0.9*1.565)-x )
the unittriangle() function defines a force per unit…
See Gmsh for how to install it, then when it's installed, click Browse ... and find gmsh.exe.
Don't copy the path in my screenshot because it'll be different.
The length is still 500 mm (the first argument, 0.5, to the unittriangle function). You can visualize this by refining the mesh enough to see a patch of arrows. I changed 500 to 1000 in the constant term to somehow scale it to agree with your formul…
I'm not sure if CCX can handle a decrease in the stress-strain curve.
It doesn't have the *TENSION CUTOFF keyword, and the *PLASTIC stress-strain data has to be non-negative (stress is von Mises), so you can't define it there.
It does, however, ha…
That's normal but it should converge towards something as time step gets smaller.
In this case, acceleration has such big high frequency components, I don't think 0.01 s fine enough too big to capture it. Maybe add damping to suppress those if they…
Those peaks of stress on the rivets might be spurious due to the contacts or the re-entrant corners under the heads.
One on the end has the slave faces extending beyond the master faces. I corrected that and it slightly reduced the stress.
If you …
Yes, the displacement pre-tension is probably the right one and it does have that problem of having to decide the displacement. One way is to first solve with the Force option, measure the resulting displacement, then set that as the Length adjustme…
1-I'have been thinking for a long time that when analysis is performed with Automatic time stepping, by default, the load is ramped from 0 at time 0 to 100 % at end time automatically too. There was no need to multiply by time in the formula.
Tha…
Quasi-static with contact sometimes converges worse than non-quasi-static because of the extra *STEP section Mecway inserts to prevent CCX from adjusting the contact stiffness (probably to help convergence!). During this extra step, the solver panel…
Hello Disla, always a doozy when you find a problem!
I didn't look at the SOL and reaction force results which I'd say aren't really part of Mecway, but the displacements changing with time isn't supposed to happen.
I made a simpler model without …